Compiled from the statements cited in Wikipedia, "Gaza genocide recognition" (revision 1376504299), each linked to its own source here, corrected for the governments that have changed since and for the 81st General Assembly, 22–25 September 2026.

• A state is counted once, on the date of its first measure; later measures by the same state do not raise the line.
• The line counts states, not the weight of what they did: a full arms ban and a travel ban on two ministers each move it by one.
• Undated ruptures and the ICC obligation are excluded from the step for the reasons given above, which means the line understates the number of states that have acted.

• Israel's policy of nuclear ambiguity was secured by a 1969 agreement between Richard Nixon and Golda Meir: the United States would stop pressing Israel to sign the NPT, in exchange for Israel not testing or acknowledging the arsenal.
• The row marked 'not stated in this record' is left blank rather than filled from outside the report.

• The word counts are the Centre for Media Monitoring's, across a full year of coverage; 'massacre' was applied to Israeli casualties 18 times more often than to Palestinian ones.
• Media Bias Meter's 'Framing Gaza' study analysed 54,449 articles across eight Western outlets over 100 weeks and found the same asymmetry in framing and word choice.
• The failure is not only framing: in 2024 The Jewish Chronicle published fabricated stories by a freelancer using the byline 'Elon Perry', retracted the material, and lost four columnists — Jonathan Freedland, David Aaronovitch, Hadley Freeman and David Baddiel — who resigned over its handling.

• CST's own analysis attributes the incident pattern to Israeli military action rather than to British policy: before October 2023 monthly totals above 200 had occurred only five times, 'each coinciding with past periods when Israel was at war', and the record annual total of 4,298 in 2023 preceded British recognition of Palestine by two years.
• The Home Office's February 2026 protective-security settlement allocated up to £40 million to mosques, £28.4 million to the Jewish community grant administered by CST — later raised to £32.4 million — and £5 million to all other faiths. Of 510 mosque applications received between 1 July 2024 and 3 November 2025, 199 had been approved, 311 remained pending, and none had been rejected.
• 45.3 per cent of Muslim women report feeling unsafe on public transport, against an 8 per cent national average.

Anti-Zionism, as manifested today through efforts to deny the Jewish people their right to self-determination, or demand that Jews renounce Zionism as the price of acceptance in political, academic, professional, or cultural life, is antisemitic. The J50 Declaration on Zionism and Antisemitism, Jerusalem, 11 September 2026. Closing line: “Zionism is part of Jewish identity. We will not allow others to define it for us.”

• Seven global and regional organisations signed, together with fifty-two national and community organisations across forty countries: fifty-nine signatories in total, the same number as the representatives at the forum of 1 September 2026.
• The declaration reaffirms the IHRA working definition but reproduces neither of its two limiting clauses: that an example counts only “depending on the overall context”, and that “criticism of Israel similar to that levelled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic”.
• Two of the signatories, the Board of Deputies of British Jews and the Jewish Leadership Council, are British; the legal record below is the law of their jurisdiction.
• A text declaring that Jews “will not allow others to define” Zionism was drafted through a forum established and hosted by a state’s foreign ministry.

Three definitions, and what each holds

What has actually been decided, in the jurisdiction of two of the signatories